Editor’s Note: Edwin Jusino, a regular contributor to Latino Rebels, also weighed in on the latest news surrounding Puerto Rico’s political status.
Last week Congress approved to assign $2.5 million so that Puerto Rico can celebrate yet another plebiscite, one that will almost certainly give the same results as the results from November 2012. There is a catch, though. The Justice Department must approve which status formulas are consistent with the Constitution and with the Administration’s public policy.
This will certainly be a shock to the island’s Popular Democrats (PPD), as they should—if Justice Department does their job—be forced to choose between non-territorial constitutionally valid formulas (i.e, statehood or any form of independence like an associated republic) outside of the current system.
As usual, the pro-statehood New Progressive Party (PNP) is supporting the 2012 election plebiscite results, and wishes for statehood “Yes or No” ratification vote.
On the other hand, both the PPD and the Independence Party (PIP) are moving towards convening a Status Assembly to negotiate with the Justice Department the terms and “definitions” of the new plebiscite.
Certainly, the incumbent PPD has the votes to decree the formation of a Status Assembly, but Resident Commissioner and statehood leader Pedro Pierluisi has, time and time again, reiterated that the PNP will not participate in such a mechanism.
The question should then be this: What is President Barack Obama’s public policy regarding the status of Puerto Rico? He has stated he will support the voice of the people of Puerto Rico, yet his Administration has been ambiguous about whether the “Estado Libre Asociado” is a viable sustainable mechanism for Puerto Rico’s future. If the DoJ does its research, it should see that the current territorial form of government limits and halts the growth of the Puerto Rican economy.
Whether you support statehood or independence, one thing must be made clear to the U.S. government:we cannot and we refuse to continue in the current territorial arrangement. Like Patrick Henry once said, “give me liberty or give me death.” or as I say, “give me equality or give me a divorce.”
The Gnostics derived their http://633cash.com/Games leading doctrines and ideas from Plato and Philo, the Zend-avesta, the Kabbalah, and the Sacred books of India and Egypt; and http://633cash.com/Pengaturan” thus introduced http://633cash.com/Daftar into the bosom of Christianity the cosmological and theosophical speculations, which had formed the larger portion of the ancient religions of the Orient, http://www.cintaberita.com joined to those of the Egyptian, Greek, http://633cash.com/Promo and Jewish doctrines, which the Neo-Platonists had equally adopted in the Occident..It is admitted that the cradle http://633cash.com/Deposit of http://633cash.com/Withdraw Gnosticism is probably to be looked for in Syria http://633cash.com/Berita and even in Palestine. Most of its expounders wrote in that corrupted form of the Greek used by the Hellenistic Jews…and there was a striking http://633cash.com/Girl analogy between their doctrines and those of the Judeo-Egyptian Philo of Alexandria; itself the seat of three schools, at once philosophic and religious, the http://633cash.com/LivescoreGreek, the Egyptian, and the Jewish. Pythagoras and Plato, the most mystical of the Grecian philosophers (the latter heir to the doctrines of the former), and who had travelled, the latter in Egypt, and the former in Phoenicia, India, and Persia, also taught the esoteric doctrine…The dominant doctrines of Plutonism were found in Gnosticism