Oh, West Side Story. What are we going to do with you? You’re like our tío‘s first wife who won’t stop showing up at family functions. And here you are making this Christmas all about you.
To be fair, the 2021 film version, out December 10, features amazing performances by Ariana DeBose and Rachel Zegler as Anita and María respectively. And director Steven Spielberg is a household name because he knows how to deliver visually stunning movies that appeal to broad audiences. His West Side Story is just that—charismatic people, delightful visuals, movie magic.
If you watch film as Anita and María’s story, there’s plenty to enjoy. They took out the most offensive lines in “America,” and DeBose uses the number to radiate charisma, bringing the entire neighborhood into her playful teasing of David Alvarez’s Bernardo. Likewise, Zegler shines in her duets, her alto soaring with a mixture of naivety and the teen disposition for risk that’s perfect for the role. They both bring real human emotions to the film’s melodrama, particularly in the final heartbreaking moments. In the end, their bodies appear small and vulnerable on the big screen, but their presence and power determine the narrative. It’s great work and they should be applauded for it.
The problem, of course, is that this is not actually their film. West Side Story is about the men and their racial conflict—and I’m not sure that bit can be fixed, though Spielberg and screenplay writer Tony Kushner have tried to make it better. For one, they actually cast Latinx people to fill all the Puerto Rican roles. There’s a line at the beginning explaining that Puerto Rico is part of the United States—always a good reminder for gringo audiences. There’s more Spanish —and it’s not subtitled!— making the film both more realistic and pulling up a special chair for Latinx audiences. And the Doc character has been replaced by Rita Moreno as Valentina in a marked improvement.
But there’s only so much they can do with the source material. In 1961, the idea of Puerto Rican gangs beating up white kids contributed to the belief that brown people were naturally dangerous, a menace to be dispensed with. The 2021 version takes great pains to make the Sharks more sympathetic, giving Bernardo a strong backstory and mentioning multiple times that the Sharks all have jobs while the Jets rely on their whiteness to skate by. The police are firmly on the Jets’ side, rooting and empathizing with them even as they urge them to find better things to do than crime. But the Romeo and Juliet basis for the film fundamentally places the two groups on equal footing—and that’s a dangerous message for us today with white supremacy, violence, and discontent on the rise. I don’t think we need a film that “both sides” the situation.
I’d also argue that some of the nuances of the Latinx experience are missing. Again, points for trying I guess, but the white men at the helm didn’t quite get it. The accents, for one, are certainly dated and confusing—especially since executive producer Rita Moreno told In The Thick back in 2017 that Anita should have Rosie Perez’s Nuyorican accent, not the stereotypical fresh-off-the-boat one featured in the film. Did they just not listen to her? Should there perhaps have been more Latinx people giving creative direction? I think so.
Also, it is certainly a step forward to see Afro-Latinidad portrayed on such a big stage, and DeBose couldn’t have been better as Anita. Plus her Blackness isn’t ignored, with her asking Bernardo at one point if they’re not married because she’s “prieta“—that’s pretty smart. And yet, toward the end of the film, there she is urging María to pick “one of her own kind.” Whose kind exactly? Without some further explanation, that line, repeated throughout “A Boy Like That,” flattens Latinidad, pretending that our differences aren’t as significant as they really are, especially with the care taken earlier to portray Anita’s racial difference.
But the biggest problem for me is Ansol Elgort as Tony. He’s been credibly accused of sexual assault, by a minor no less, and watching him as the romantic lead in this film turned my stomach. María and Tony are supposed to have an age difference —there’s certainly a maturity difference— and with Elgort’s past, it was downright irresponsible for the filmmakers to release this version with him in the role. Not to mention, the story valorizes the idea that violent men just need the love of a good woman to change, and with a known abuser as the male lover, the whole thing devolves into a misogynistic fantasy. That Elgort also doesn’t have the range to show Tony as both a hopeless romantic and a man inclined toward deadly violence doesn’t help either. He’s just a dope with a good singing voice. They should have given his cardigan to someone else.
I grew up with West Side Story and love the songs. Hearing the first few notes was a rush, a welcome back to a missed alternate reality. But when I watched it as a kid, someone generally turned it off before the rape scene, and this West Side Story needs the same sort of editing to be enjoyed. It’s not just imperfect, it continues the original’s tradition of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities. In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch something else.
***
A writer and activist, Cristina Escobar is the co-founder of latinamedia.co, uplifting Latina and gender non-conforming Latinx perspectives in media. She’s a member of the Latino Entertainment Journalists Association and writes at the intersection of race, gender, and pop culture. Twitter: @cescobarandrade
Sure, it’s a contrived & in many ways unrealistic portrayal of the Puerto Rican community in the US mainland, especially in more contemporary times, but it’s good clean fun & a great excuse to enjoy some REALLY GOOD acting, dancing & singing & some KILLER film-making as well as a TIMELY reminder to our fellow citizens of Anglo-Saxon ethnic/cultural extraction that there are MANY ways of being “American”, not just the cookie-cutter idealized “One Size Fits All”, “Leave it to Beaver” lily white template that they’re so fond of… as well as a reality check concerning the fact that in about 10 years’ time white Anglo-Saxon Americans will cease to be an absolute majority in the USA, the country we all share & cherish. Food for thought…
Shakespeare wasn’t a Danish Prince. Verdi wasn’t a Bohemian. Beethoven was never a political prisoner. Shakespeare wouldn’t have given us any dramas at all if he’d been a Danish prince. Beethoven wouldn’t have lived past 23 if he’d been a political prisoner. What makes art great (or not) doesn’t depend on the artist’s personal living arrangements but on their ability to express ideas narratively. The hundreds of people involved in the making of this film had that narrative ability in spades. It was a fabulous collaboration.
“…a TIMELY reminder to our fellow citizens of Anglo-Saxon ethnic/cultural extraction that there are MANY ways of being “American”, not just the cookie-cutter idealized “One Size Fits All”, “Leave it to Beaver” lily white template that they’re so fond of…”
So, white people—who all love the “‘Leave it to Beaver’ lily white template”—should be more accepting of other cultures and not make sweeping generalizations about other races. Got it.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Armando.
Ah, yes, the “ad hominem” logical fallacy strikes again. For the record, I never meant to say or imply that I’m not guilty personally of some very sweeping generalizations. Prejudices are like heat and cold insofar as there are DEGREES of prejudice just like there are degrees of temperature although, in my defense, it should be obvious by my tone that I don’t propose that ALL white people of Anglo-Saxon extraction share in anti Hispanic prejudices and erroneous characterizations or that those who harbor such sentiments share them to the same extent or degree. O will, however, express myself more precisely in the future.
Oh shut up. The movie was amazing- and its cast is done right this time in terms of having ALL Latino actors/actresses playing the Puerto Ricans etc.
You are Dumbx and it’s good to see your sort of Dumbxery contributed to this wokefest bombing
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the brand new film. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a harmful narrative even because it provides Latinx folks some vital alternatives,” Latino Rebels movie critic Cristina Escobar writes of the brand new film. “Ultimately, it’s a movie by and for white guys, and I’d […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] seria incluso al mismo tiempo que brinda algunas oportunidades importantes para los latinos», La crítica de cine rebelde latina Cristina Escobar Escribe sobre la nueva película. «Al final del día, es una película hecha y para hombres […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
[…] of advancing a dangerous narrative even as it offers Latinx people some important opportunities,” Latino Rebels film critic Cristina Escobar writes of the new movie. “In the end, it’s a film by and for white guys, and I’d rather watch […]
The writer is certainly free to not like the movie, but I don’t get the “it’s a film by and for white guys” comment. Aren’t the Latino/Latinx cast members in this remake essential co-creators of the film as well? And what about all of the Latino/Latinx technical talent that fills the credits? As for the film being “for white guys,” how exactly is that conclusion reached? I assume Steven Spielberg and the studio want the film to be seen by the broadest audience as possible, out of self-interest if nothing else. Also, do you put so much dialogue in untranslated Spanish if you’re making a play for the white guy audience? I think the writer had some of her conclusions about this film firmly in mind before she saw the first frame of it, thinking if a work of art doesn’t conform to a specific checklist, it must be questionable.
Commie losers. This is why you fail at everything. Your heros are socialist homeowners like Bernie. FOH
It’s a pretty terrific and still timely film, with Latinos, of course, contributing an enormous amount to it. With her easy “it’s a film by and for white guys” conclusion, I think the critic had her mind made up about up about this movie well before she sat down to watch it.
Some folks read too much into what’s essentially a film critic’s column–and they’re WAY too uptight about certain things, not to mention that they’re parroting the same stale right wing mantras of the last 100 years: “Commies”, “Reds”, “Socialism bad, capitalism good”. REALLY? Pushing the same panic buttons so that those who don’t give the matter any serious thought –or don’t want to– will hiss and boo on cue in knee jerk fashion like Pavlov’s dogs. Can’t they at least be MORE ORIGINAL? Plus it’s the HOLIDAY SEASON for crying out loud! SIT DOWN, CHILL OUT, have another helping of leftover turkey or pumpkin pie. Hang up the mistletoe and break out the eggnog, loosen your belt and let go some gas, YOU’LL FEEL A LOT BETTER–and TRY a bit of CRITICAL THINKING for a change.
Why can’t we all just get along and stop sweating the small stuff? This is a ridiculous article. Please write positive things. That’s what we all need right now during this Pandemic. I loved this movie. Sorry to say but the negative comments you made are ridiculous. You shouldn’t be a movie commentator. Maybe concentrate on writing real news instead. Thank you.
[…] by Latinx writers. Right here are the opinions from Nerds of Coloration, Pop Sugar Latina, Latino Rebels, But Why Tho? Podcast, Whole Circle Cinema, and Todas PR (composed in Spanish). Julio Varela also […]
[…] West Side Story Misses the Mark […]
Thanks for this review. Apart from the valid point on Elgort’s past, the difference in quality between his performance and the other main white actor, Mike Faist, is truly jarring. At its core, West Side Story will always remain problematic to a degree; I guess we’ll simply be taking the good with the bad. I also feel like they were hinting at an interesting direction in the beginning, with Riff snapping back at the lieutenant that it wasn’t the puertoricans who were removing them, but the authority for slum removal. That would have been an interesting thread to go off of, but I guess hollywood liberals have about the same awareness of a flip-flop on trying to elaborate on issues intersecting race and class. Oh well, we still have the songs I guess.
Valid points all around. I think there’s always room for a Hollywood remake of an old classic & both the original & the remake can be appreciated on their merits & in their proper historical context (of when they were made) & both can be enjoyed as what they’re primarily intended as: POPULAR ENTERTAINMENT.
Your freaking website is called Latino Rebels and you still have the nerve to use the term “Latinx”?
[…] and more like the New York Time’s Magazine’s Carina del Valle Schorske and Latino Rebel’s Cristina Escobar and Primera Tanda’s Mario Alegre are hoping this is the end of “West Side […]
The Story is set in that time. Like it or not, that was the way of life. The story plays well to the time
I saw your dissenting negative review while taking in dozens of reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, and was drawn to read your full review here with great curiosity (as a Latinx family, cinema lover, musicals lover, and delighted viewer of the film). As you seem to acknowledge, this is an astoundingly good film that while imperfect in its portrayal of Latinx characters, has made *tremendous* improvements on the original and I believe, outdoes even Lin Manuel’s In the Heights in representation with a broader palette of Latinx cast members of different shades, and profoundly more complex and realistic range of human emotions and themes. The film is objectively, undeniably, an absurdly fantastic *masterpiece* of cinema art. I agree with your criticisms individually, but your overall negative assessment, baffles me. And yeah, I cringe when i hear Michael Jackson music these day or see a Woody Allen film—and i may even boycott or avoid consuming that content. But, rotten tomatoes for Thriller or Bullets Over Broadway?