So Super Tuesday happened and as of this posting, the delegate count has Joe Biden with 637 delegates and Bernie Sanders with 559 (via the AP, and yes, this can change, so keep checking here).
It is safe to say that if Sanders did not do so well with Latino voters in the West (California, Colorado and Utah) and Texas, he would have had a much bigger delegate deficit. As NBC Latino noted, “Latino voters boosted Sen. Bernie Sanders on Super Tuesday, coming through for him after a big investment in the community by his presidential campaign.”
Let’s break down Super Tuesday as much as we can and then share where this all goes next. (FYI, for our previous pre-Super Tuesday vote, go here).
Super Tuesday Latino Voter Summary
Some Exit Polls
People asked me about ages of Black and Latino voters exit polls info. pic.twitter.com/8YmwNT1Y8O
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 4, 2020
Exit Polls #SuperTuesday
FIRST WAVERace
62%: White
18%: Latino
14%: Black
3%: Asian— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 3, 2020
California (Sanders win)
California exit polls show that @BernieSanders got 55% of Latino voters and @JoeBiden got 21% of Latinos. #SuperTuesday
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 4, 2020
And here is Sanders and Imperial. pic.twitter.com/vxHSdTKXtY
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
Source: https://t.co/2b0iwcYpY5
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
Texas (Biden win)
More about #Texas exit polls. The moderate Latinos in Texas won't vote for Sanders narrative didn't pan out. #SuperTuesdayResults pic.twitter.com/HylPLrC8rO
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 4, 2020
New #SuperMartes analysis out of @UCLALatino shows Sanders greatest showing in Texas came from super-majority Latino geographies including El Paso, San Antonio, and almost the entire Rio Grande Valley. We'll be posting more detailed data all day long so check back in pic.twitter.com/AOKU1nNdB8
— UCLA LPPI (@UCLAlatino) March 4, 2020
MORE TEXAS DATA – #Latinovote in Dallas and Harris Counties, show Sanders winning Latino vote by 25-30 points over Biden in two large Texas counties. Our team of researchers scraped all precinct results, matched to racial demographics and estimated ecological models of vote pic.twitter.com/H6imd9QqFo
— UCLA LPPI (@UCLAlatino) March 6, 2020
More Analysis from @UCLAlatino on #LatinoVote in Texas: Analyzing all precincts across Harris County, Texas (Houston) we find Latino vote was 47% Sanders vs. 15% for Biden #SuperMartes pic.twitter.com/Wghp6qt9Gp
— UCLA LPPI (@UCLAlatino) March 5, 2020
BREAKING: #LPPI calculated the vote choice of Latino-majority counties in Texas (70% or more Latino CVAP).
Senator Sanders received 30% of the #Latinovote, followed by Mayor Bloomberg (23.5%), then VP Biden (21%), in Texas' Latino-majority counties. pic.twitter.com/fdScvBS4PA
— UCLA LPPI (@UCLAlatino) March 4, 2020
Colorado (Sanders win)
This is Colorado, the #SuperTuesday state with the third largest share of Latinos.
Teal is Sanders. Besides Denver, see Southern Colorado which borders New Mexico and Western Colorado, which borders Utah.
Also those areas are north of Navajo Nation. pic.twitter.com/ZsvjmG5Q7n
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
Sanders looks like he got a big win in Colorado:
-1/5 voters were Latino
-Sanders won non-white voters overwhelmingly, according to the exit polls.The eyes of Texas are upon #SuperTuesday
— Domenico Montanaro (@DomenicoNPR) March 4, 2020
Utah (Sanders win)
Let's look at #Utah
Part of Salt Lake is in a district where 10.6% of the eligible voter population is Latino (Pew).
That went to Sanders. pic.twitter.com/zNLcb6RVo7
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
Virginia (Biden win)
BREAKING: #LatinoVote in Virginia split almost evenly between Senator Sanders & VP Biden. #LPPI analyzed all precincts in the state to understand Latino vote preference.
Latino turnout is ⬆️ over 2016 primary. pic.twitter.com/iyYm0jxqEE
— UCLA LPPI (@UCLAlatino) March 4, 2020
Massachusetts (Biden win)
FYI, Sanders also won Holyoke (most Puerto Ricans per capita in US) and Worcester (a lot of Puerto Ricans there).
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
SOURCE: https://t.co/DDl6B3agct
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
North Carolina (Biden win)
Looks like this was a state that Biden might have done good enough with Latinos, just like Virginia. (Source: @nytimes) pic.twitter.com/7QBZ8SshS6
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 6, 2020
Oklahoma (Biden win)
Two other places where Sanders did not do well where there were Latino eligible voter shares—8.5% (OK 5) 6.8% (OK 4) #Oklahomahttps://t.co/8u3vAlEQAW
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
Arkansas (Biden win)
Note: The state abbreviation for Arkansas is AR and not AK.
This is Arkansas. The ONLY county Sanders won was in #Fayetteville, which is part of a congressional district (AK 3) that has an 8% eligible Latino voter population (according to PEW).
Sanders won the #Fayetteville area. pic.twitter.com/Znnds8yf38
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
Tennessee (Biden win)
One place with 3% Latino eligible voter districts where Sanders did not do well was in western Tennessee.https://t.co/ZBdDTHGGdp
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
Minnesota (Biden win)
Also #Minnesota. The two congressional districts with eligible Latino voters in 4% range (around Minneapolis/St. Paul) were in the area that Biden won.
(Source of results: @nytimes) pic.twitter.com/5P8KxQJs1s
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 6, 2020
Not Applicable (all Latino % at 2 or lower)
Alabama (Biden win)
Maine (Biden win)
Vermont (Sanders win)
Hope some of that data gives you a flavor of it all. Sanders did extremely well in border communities in TX & CA, plus overall w/Latinos there. He also did very well in immigrant urban areas in MA. He did well in MA places where there were a lot of Puerto Ricans. Also, CO & UT.
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
Upcoming Primaries (March 10)
All data sourced to Pew.
These March 10 states do not have states with big Latino eligible voter populations (except for parts of Washington and maybe Idaho), but it does have a mix of states across the country, except for the East Coast.
Washington: Did you know that 7.7% of Washington’s eligible voter population is Latino (411,000 out of a total 5,359,000)? Granted, the coronavirus scare might have an impact on the state’s turnout (the state doesn’t think so), but it is interesting to note that this state is seeing a growing Latino population. Let’s check the congressional district breakdown:
Washington’s 4th congressional district (Yakima and Tri-Cities areas) has a 23.1 % share of eligible Latino voters.
Idaho: This is another state where people might know has a growing Latino population. Pew says that “8.1% of the eligible voter population is Latino (101,000 out of a total 1,254,000).”
Here are the two districts:
Michigan: According to Pew, “3.5% of the eligible voter population is Latino (261,000 out of a total 7,549,000). However, that share varies depending on the state’s congressional districts.
For example, Michigan’s 2nd congressional district (on the state’s western side) has 37,000 eligible Latino voters. This district currently has a Republican representative.
The next top district is Michigan’s 13th district, which is metro Detroit. That has about 21,000 eligible Latino voters, and on a recent reporting trip to the city’s predominantly Latino Southwest neighborhood, voters shared their thoughts:
These voters, all these Latinos (even older ones), about 10-15 of them, shared a general view that #SuperTuesday had them thinking of what their vote will be, but that they will at least vote on Tuesday but they are not sure if they will vote in November.
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) March 5, 2020
North Dakota: With one at-large district, North Dakota’s eligible Latino voter population of 17,000 represents 3% of the total eligible voter population.
Missouri: According to Pew, “2.7% of the eligible voter population is Latino (125,000 out of a total 4,638,000).”
These are the congressional district breakdowns:
The top congressional district is the fifth, with 34,000 eligible Latino voters. This district is part of metro Kansas City. Its representative is Democrat Emanuel Cleaver, who is African American.
Mississippi: According to Pew, “1.6% of the eligible voter population is Latino (36,000 out of a total 2,240,000)”, but as the congressional districts show, that average varies, with the state’s 4th district (on the Gulf of Mexico) showing a 2.7% eligible Latino voter share.
We will do a post about the March 17 states after the March 10 primaries
[…] outside of LA, overwhelming evidence suggests that broad support for Senator Sanders’ policies exists among Latinxs. Targeted grassroots […]
[…] Arizona Latinos to vote for him. That finding would confirm the general 2020 trend that Sanders continues to do well with Latinos and younger Latinos in general, and that Biden might have to make sure Latinos come out for him in November, in contrast to 2016, […]